I was reading about a man being arrested for his money having the smell of marijuana. In that news, the whole focus is on the man and his marijuana found. The whole operation is too smooth to be true. The bank teller is able to identify the smell! Right from the start, who on earth can identify such a smell except for the one who consumed it or to do business with it?

The few possible ideas might be:

  1. The arrested man is just being unlucky to be arrested.
  2. Or the bank teller was trained in banks to identify such smell.
  3. Or the bank teller did business or consumed before.
  4. Or the bank teller was previously a police or some investigator.
  5. Or the bank teller was being instructed by someone else to frame the arrested man.

The whole idea is that the one who is more suspicious is the bank teller instead of the arrested man. The whole story was done in such a way that the whole operation looks so smooth… Is it really true?


  • Some Other Posts You Might Be Interested:

  • Add to Onlywire Add to Onlywire

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    Comments »

    No comments yet.

    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Subscribe to comments via email
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.